TPU Inner Tubes: Tubolito, Revoloop, Aerothan, Vittoria, Continental, Pirelli, Rene Herse, Silca, Aeron, M-Wave, Eclipse, Wolfpack, RideNow, Barbieri, and FOSS, Compared to Butyl, Light Butyl, and Latex
Contents
- Introduction
- Test Set Up and Conditions
- Average Test Results
- Individual Test Results (Pro Members)
- Conclusion
- Comments
Update 2022-12-22: We've added test data of the Pirelli SmarTube, Eclipse Road 20-25, Barbieri NXT, Vittoria Ultra Light Speed, and RideNow Race Formula TPU tubes.
Update 2026-01-16: We've added test data of the Pirelli P Zero SmarTube RS, RideNow Ultralight, Continental ContiTPU, Rene Herse Ultralight, Silca Ultimate, Aeron Road, and M-Wave PURride TPU tubes.
TPU inner tubes have been available for a while now, and as many of you know they can save quite a bit of rotational weight over the traditional latex and butyl inner tubes. As all manufacturers specify the weight of their inner tubes, it's easy to compare the inner tubes against each other on weight alone. What's less obvious, and just as important to know, is the rolling resistance of these inner tubes as they're all made from slightly different materials.
As requested by our Pro Members, we bought all the currently available TPU inner tubes and tested them all on our rolling resistance test machine. We've also tested a selection of butyl, light butyl, and a latex inner tube to compare them to what we've all been using for the past 50+ years.
For this comparison, we collected a lot of data as we didn't just stick with testing the 23 inner tubes with just a single road bike tire. We've tested all inner tubes with the all-round Grand Prix 5000, cotton Vittoria Corsa G+ 2.0, and the currently fastest tube-type time trial tire: Michelin Power Time Trial.
In total, we've collected 207 points of rolling resistance data of all the inner tube and tire combinations. To keep the test results easy to understand for first-time visitors of our site, we averaged the results of the 3 different tires and made that data available for free for everyone.
Pro Members can open the individual tire data and dig into the results further.
Test Set Up and Conditions
We've tested the following TPU tubes:
- Aeron Road (33 grams)
- Barbieri NXT TPU Tube (45 grams)
- Continental ContiTPU (36 grams)
- Eclipse Road 20-25 (27 grams)
- FOSS TPU Tube (99 grams)
- M-Wave PURride (36 grams)
- Pirelli P Zero SmarTube (35 grams)
- Pirelli P Zero SmarTube RS (35 grams)
- Rene Herse Ultralight TPU (37 grams)
- Revoloop Ultra (25 grams) = Wolfpack TPU
- Revoloop (39 grams)
- RideNow Race Formula TPU Tube (36 grams)
- RideNow Ultralight TPU Tube (20 grams)
- Schwalbe Aerothan (43 grams)
- Silca Ultimate TPU Tube (40 grams)
- Tubolito S-Tubo Road (22 grams)
- Tubolito Road (39 grams)
- Vittoria Ultra Light Speed (30 grams)
About the Wolfpack TPU Tube: We ordered a "Wolfpack TPU tube" from their official store. Wolfpack shipped us a box that simply contained a Revoloop Ultra (25 grams) tube. From this, we assume their tube is the Revoloop Ultra tube.
We've used the following "classic" tubes which is a selection of the most popular inner tubes:
- Continental Race 28 Light (75 grams)
- Continental Race 28 (102 grams)
- Schwalbe SV20 Light (72 grams)
- Schwalbe SV15 (105 grams)
- Vittoria Latex 25/28 (80 grams)
All rolling resistance tests were performed with our standard test protocol. This is the same protocol used for nearly all of the rolling resistance data found on this website.
Rolling Resistance Test Conditions
- Speed of 8 m/s - 28.8 km/h - 18 mph
- Total wheel load of 42.5 kg / 94 lbs
- 17.8 mm internal width rim
- Temperature between 21.5-22.5 °C / 71-72 °F
- Diamond plate drum surface
- 77 cm drum diameter
Test Results - TPU Tubes Average of 3 Tires
We've tested all TPU, butyl, and latex tubes with 3 different road bike tires:
- Continental Grand Prix 5000 25-622
- Vittoria Corsa G+ 2.0 25-622
- Michelin Power Time Trial 25-622
To keep the test results comprehensible and easy to understand, we've averaged the test results of the 3 different tires:
| Inner Tube | Type | Weight | Rolling Resistance at 100 psi / 6.9 barsRR 100 psi 6.9 bar |
Rolling Resistance at 80 psi / 5.5 barsRR 80 psi 5.5 bar |
Rolling Resistance at 60 psi / 4.1 barsRR 60 psi 4.1 bar |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grams | Watts | Watts | Watts | ||
| Vittoria Latex 25/28 | Latex | 80 | 9.5 | 10.8 | 12.9 |
| Pirelli P Zero SmarTube RS | TPU | 35 | 9.7 | 10.9 | 13.0 |
| RideNow Ultralight | TPU | 20 | 9.7 | 11.1 | 13.4 |
| Revoloop Ultra | TPU | 25 | 9.8 | 11.0 | 13.1 |
| Vittoria Ultra Light Speed | TPU | 30 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 13.5 |
| Continental ContiTPU | TPU | 36 | 9.8 | 11.2 | 13.5 |
| Tubolito S-Tubo Road | TPU | 22 | 10.0 | 11.1 | 13.5 |
| RideNow Race Formula | TPU | 36 | 10.0 | 11.4 | 13.6 |
| Revoloop | TPU | 39 | 10.2 | 11.5 | 13.7 |
| Eclipse Road 20-25 | TPU | 27 | 10.2 | 11.5 | 13.9 |
| Rene Herse Ultralight | TPU | 37 | 10.2 | 11.6 | 14.0 |
| Silca Ultimate | TPU | 40 | 10.2 | 11.6 | 14.1 |
| Schwalbe Aerothan | TPU | 43 | 10.3 | 11.6 | 13.9 |
| Aeron Road | TPU | 33 | 10.3 | 11.7 | 14.1 |
| Barbieri NXT | TPU | 45 | 10.4 | 11.8 | 14.3 |
| Conti Race28 Light | Butyl | 75 | 10.5 | 11.6 | 14.0 |
| Pirelli P Zero SmarTube | TPU | 35 | 10.6 | 12.1 | 14.7 |
| Schwalbe SV20 Light | Butyl | 72 | 10.7 | 12.0 | 14.7 |
| Tubolito Road | TPU | 39 | 10.8 | 12.2 | 14.7 |
| M-Wave PURride | TPU | 36 | 10.8 | 12.4 | 15.1 |
| Conti Race28 | Butyl | 102 | 11.1 | 12.6 | 15.1 |
| FOSS Tube | TPU | 99 | 11.8 | 13.6 | 16.6 |
| Schwalbe SV15 | Butyl | 105 | 12.4 | 14.0 | 17.1 |
| Average of 3 road bike tires (Speed: 29 kmh / 18 mph, Load: 42.5 kg / 417 N) | |||||
The averaged results show the 80 grams latex tube still has a lower rolling resistance than even the lightest TPU tubes. Latex still is the most efficient rolling material, but the tubes can't be made as light as the lightest TPU tubes as latex isn't all that strong. Airtightness of the latex tubes is also less than even the lightest 22 grams TPU tube see Tubolito article.
When it comes to absolute speed, the Pirelli P Zero SmarTube RS is the fastest rolling TPU inner tube. Surprisingly, the Pirelli RS isn't even the lightest at 35 grams, but it still is the fastest TPU tube. The SmarTube RS is made from a different kind of TPU that feels more flexible and feels like a mix of TPU and latex. This newer tube is a big step up from the old non-RS SmarTube, which weighs 35 grams but rolls much slower.
The ultra-light 20 grams RideNow Ultralight, and 25 grams Revoloop Ultra come in slightly behind the 80 grams latex tube when purely looking at the rolling resistance. The difference is incredibly small, and in practice, these might be just as fast as the latex tube as you'll save a good amount of rotational weight.
The 30 grams Vittoria Ultra Light Speed and 36 grams Continental ContiTPU tubes come in slightly behind the ultra-light tubes, but they are built more durable and might be a good choice if you need more protection than the 20-25-gram tubes.
Next on we find the 36 grams RideNow Race Formula, 39 grams Revoloop, 27 grams Eclipse Road, 37 grams Rene Herse Ultralight, 40 grams Silca Ultimate, 43 grams Schwalbe Aerothan, and the 33 grams Aeron Road that both perform nearly the same. The 45 grams Barbieri NXT, 35 grams Pirelli P Zero SmarTube, and 39 grams Tubolito Road tubes have a slightly higher rolling resistance than the other tubes of a comparable weight.
An important comparison for the ~ 40 grams TPU tubes are the light-butyl tubes as those are often used by riders looking for a bit more performance. In our opinion, the ~ 40 grams TPU tubes clearly perform better as they are lighter, roll faster, and air retention should be at least equal or better.
The 99 grams FOSS TPU tube clearly is an outlier in this comparison, but rolling resistance probably isn't all that important for the FOSS tube. The FOSS TPU tube is marketed mainly as an environmentally friendly tube that also offers improved puncture resistance over butyl tubes. We must say that this looks like a good replacement as it outperforms the heavier Schwalbe SV15 which probably is the benchmark for a standard butyl tube. The 102 grams Continental Race 28 simply is the fastest rolling ~ 100 grams butyl tube.
Test Results - Individual Rolling Resistance Data (Pro Members)
The next section is only accessible by our highly valued Pro Members. This section includes all test data of the individual tires used for the TPU inner tube tests: Continental Grand Prix 5000, Vittoria Corsa G+ 2.0, and the Michelin Power Time Trial.
In total, you'll get access to an additional 207 data points. This TPU tubes article has been made possible by our Pro Members and the amount of data collected for this TPU inner tubes test was only possible because of their support. If you value our site, please consider to show your support by signing up for a Pro membership.
Conclusion
Inner tubes have come a long way and we now have road bike inner tubes that weigh just 20 grams. The extremely low weight of these tubes is also the biggest advantage as latex inner tubes still have a (slightly) lower rolling resistance when combined with most road bike tires. We do see slight differences between cotton and nylon road bike tires, and we attribute the differences to the different levels of friction between the inner tubes and tires.
Even though weight is important, we see the fastest TPU tube isn't the lightest: The Pirelli P Zero SmarTube RS comes in at 35 grams, which is 75% heavier than the lightest TPU tubes, but it still rolls faster. The Pirelli SmarTube RS is made from a softer, more flexible TPU than the other TPU tubes, and it feels much more like a traditional latex tube than the other TPU tubes.
In the ultra-light TPU inner tube class, we find 2 tubes with very strong performance: RideNow Ultralight (20 grams) and Revoloop Ultra (25 grams). The ultra-light tubes come very close to the low rolling resistance of the latex inner tube and Pirelli P Zero SmarTube RS. Price and availability probably can make the difference between these inner tubes.
The Vittoria Ultra Light Speed (30 grams) and Continental ContiTPU (36 grams) are excellent choices if you don't want to go for the absolute lightest TPU tubes as they should be a bit more durable.
Behind those tubes, we see a range of TPU tubes from different manufacturers, all of which come in close to each other. If you don't need the absolute ragged edge of performance, those tubes should serve you well, and it might be more a factor of durability than performance when picking one over the other.
Then there's also the 99 grams FOSS TPU inner tube that definitely isn't as much of a performance inner tube but still offers comparable performance to the 100 grams butyl inner tubes. FOSS claims these offer improved puncture resistance over standard tubes, if that's true, it would be a good replacement for the classic butyl inner tubes. The FOSS TPU tube also is the cheapest TPU tube with a price that is comparable to standard butyl tubes.